[Opera-users] Forwarding several messages to one person?
branislav misovic
bmisovic at brod.pfri.hr
Sat Jun 16 10:41:01 UTC 2001
hi there.
So when I mark few mails in inbox, and when with right clik I
choose to forward them to someone, only last one that was checke
is ready for
forwarding !?
Any work arounds ???
stay well
branko
>Send Opera-users mailing list submissions to
> opera-users at opera.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://list.opera.com/mailman/listinfo/opera-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> opera-users-request at opera.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> opera-users-admin at opera.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
>than "Re: Contents of Opera-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Cookies (Peter Meyns)
> 2. Re: Cookies (Erik)
> 3. Re: Linux & Opera (Dr Adrian Midgley)
> 4. Re: Cookies (Peter Meyns)
> 5. Re: Cookies (Tass)
> 6. Re[2]: [Opera-users] Cookies (Erik)
> 7. missing dll? (Dr Adrian Midgley)
> 8. Opera Button List Rearrangement. (Jim Cleveland)
> 9. checking email (Richard Malisch)
> 10. Re: turning off email, etc. (James Card)
> 11. Re: turning off email, etc. (James Card)
> 12. Rollover Images (Dave Barton)
> 13. Re: turning off email, etc. (Tass)
> 14. 2 pages, no images/links--JavaScript the culprit? (Warrick
Bell)
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:50:46 +0200
>From: Peter Meyns <meyns at gmx.net>
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>Subject: [Opera-users] Cookies
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Hi you all,
>
>Opera lets me choose how to handle cookies. The default setting
is to accept
>every cookie every time or choose differently. I'd like my default
set to
>"accept, but delete when closing Opera" or choose. How can I do
this?
>
>TIA
>Best regards
>Peter
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:42:06 -0400
>From: Erik <musesilk at gmx.net>
>To: "Peter Meyns on opera-users" <opera-users at opera.com>
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] Cookies
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Hi Peter,
>
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, at 21:50:46 [GMT +0200]
> (which was 3:50 PM where I live) you wrote:
>
>> Hi you all,
>
>> Opera lets me choose how to handle cookies. The default
setting is to accept
>> every cookie every time or choose differently. I'd like my
default set to
>> "accept, but delete when closing Opera" or choose. How can I
do this?
>
>Have you tried checking "throw away new cookies on exit"?
>(file/prefs/privacy)
>Additionally, you can delete all cookies with file/delete private
>data, uncheck all but delete all cookies and delete temporary
cookies.
> Keep in mind this will close all open windows...
>
>--
>Best regards,
> Erik
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:35:45 +0100
>To: Opera users list <opera-users at opera.no>
>From: Dr Adrian Midgley <midgley at mednetics.org>
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] Linux & Opera
>Organization: Homefield
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Opera 5 for Linux has a feature that 5.11 for Windows doesn't
yet.
>They seem to be about even in advancement - I suspect that there
>will be a quick couple of minor versions though so perhaps
they'll
>head toward synchrony soon.
>--
>Adrian Midgley
>Exeter
>http://www.swis.net/midgley/
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:40:42 +0200
>From: Peter Meyns <meyns at gmx.net>
>To: Erik <opera-users at opera.com>
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] Cookies
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:42:06 -0400GMT (which was 22:42
+0200GMT where I live),
>Erik wrote this about "[Opera-users] Cookies":
>
>>> Opera lets me choose how to handle cookies. The default
setting is to accept
>>> every cookie every time or choose differently. I'd like my
default set to
>>> "accept, but delete when closing Opera" or choose. How can
I do this?
>
>E> Have you tried checking "throw away new cookies on exit"?
>E> (file/prefs/privacy)
>E> Additionally, you can delete all cookies with file/delete
private
>E> data, uncheck all but delete all cookies and delete temporary
cookies.
>
>Hi Erik,
>thank you for the info. That's all good and useful.
>But sometimes there might be cookies I want to keep.
>What I would like to achieve is to get alerted for every new
cookie (like now),
>but have the default choice set to "accept, but delete on closing",
so I don't
>have to choose it manually over and over again. I'd rather choose
manually those
>few cookies that I want to keep.
>
>Cheers
>Peter
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:08:30 -0600
>From: "Tass" <anim at operamail.com>
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] Cookies
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>
>
>{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ BEGIN ORIGINAL MESSAGE
}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
>
> ----SUBJECT ----> Re: [Opera-users] Cookies
>On 06/12/01 at 11:40 PM
>I was just minding my own business when
>Peter Meyns wrote:
>
>>)On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:42:06 -0400GMT (which was 22:42
+0200GMT where I
>>)live),
>>)Erik wrote this about "[Opera-users] Cookies":
>>)
>>)>> Opera lets me choose how to handle cookies. The default
setting is to
>>)accept
>>)>> every cookie every time or choose differently. I'd like my
default set
>>)to
>>)>> "accept, but delete when closing Opera" or choose. How
can I do this?
>>)
>>)E> Have you tried checking "throw away new cookies on
exit"?
>>)E> (file/prefs/privacy)
>>)E> Additionally, you can delete all cookies with file/delete
private
>>)E> data, uncheck all but delete all cookies and delete
temporary cookies.
>>)
>>)Hi Erik,
>>)thank you for the info. That's all good and useful.
>>)But sometimes there might be cookies I want to keep.
>>)What I would like to achieve is to get alerted for every new
cookie (like
>>)now),
>>)but have the default choice set to "accept, but delete on
closing", so I
>>)don't
>>)have to choose it manually over and over again. I'd rather
choose
>>)manually those
>>)few cookies that I want to keep.
>>)
>>)Cheers
>>)Peter
>
>
>Hey Peter,
>As has been mentioned recently, "WebWasher" is the answer.
>It has MANY options and blocks/controls cookies, scripts and
>other nasties that can invade your privacy behind your back
>without you EVER knowing it.
>
>http://www.webwasher.com/
>
>Another thing I use to block others from getting into my system
>entirely is:
>ZoneAlarm from ZoneLabs. It's not only for those with DSL or
>cable modems either. Works great. And if you want to see just
>how well it works, check the activity log and see just how many
>out there have been getting into your system, but now can't.
>It also one of the VERY few firewalls that can block others from
>using your computer as a BOT participant for hackers (another
>thing that happens without you ever knowing it's going on).
>And most likely, it's the only firewall that can do this that is free.
>
>
>http://www.zonelabs.com/
>
>Both are available as free down loads.
>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:38:49 -0400
>From: Erik <musesilk at gmx.net>
>To: "Peter Meyns on opera-users" <opera-users at opera.com>
>Subject: Re[2]: [Opera-users] Cookies
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Hi Peter,
>
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, at 23:40:42 [GMT +0200]
> (which was 5:40 PM where I live) you wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik,
>> thank you for the info. That's all good and useful.
>> But sometimes there might be cookies I want to keep.
>> What I would like to achieve is to get alerted for every new
cookie (like now),
>> but have the default choice set to "accept, but delete on
closing", so I don't
>> have to choose it manually over and over again. I'd rather
choose manually those
>> few cookies that I want to keep.
>
>You might try setting your cookie filter to "display received
cookies"
>(file/prefs/privacy - first drop down box...). When the display
>received cookie window comes up, you can choose from a drop
down menu
>that has the following:
>
>Accept, including updates before closing Opera
>Accept without changes
>Accept, but delete when closing Opera
>Accept, but save when closing Opera
>Accept all from this server
>Refuse cookies from this server
>Accept all cookies from this domain
>Refuse cookies from this domain
>
>I am not certain, but checking "throw away cookies on exit" may
>override "accept, but save when closing Opera" cookie options.
>
>This may be what you are looking for, short of an external cookie
>manager or local proxy with cookie handling.
>
>--
>Best regards,
> Erik
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:03:26 +0100
>To: Opera users list <opera-users at opera.no>
>From: Dr Adrian Midgley <midgley at mednetics.org>
>Organization: Homefield
>Subject: [Opera-users] missing dll?
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>pnui3250.dll
>
>This wa sreported to be unfindable by Opera 5.11 on NT4 when
I
>tried to load the embedded object in a page at
>
>http://www2.ucsc.edu/~scpbrg/ledge_feed.htm
>
>which should be a webcam showing some peregrine falcons
>nesting on the Oracle building.
>
>So is it part of Real plug in or part of Opera?
>I looked at the source code and found the address for the
>webcam, which worked.
>
>--
>Adrian Midgley
>Exeter
>http://www.swis.net/midgley/
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:21:04 -0300
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>From: Jim Cleveland <jimcleveland at Operamail.com>
>Subject: [Opera-users] Opera Button List Rearrangement.
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Thanks for your input, Samuli...I will send Opera an
>email to request this feature.
>
>Another question for you or anyone else:
>
>Is there any way to rearrange the order of the
>buttons on the button bar?
>(New/Print/Find/Hotlist/Full (F11)...and so on)
>I would like the "Back" button where the "New"
>button is...a personal preference.
>
>I have 5.11
>
>Thanks in advance to all.
>
>Jim C.
>
>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:42:08 -0500
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>From: Richard Malisch <malisch at madison.tds.net>
>Organization: Home
>Subject: [Opera-users] checking email
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>
>forgive a newbie, but, how can I check my email without trying to
"find" a specific one or waiting for a new mail to come in? For
example if I simply want to reread any or all of my old or read
mail in my inbox what do I
>do to see them?
>Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 10
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:05:26 -0700
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>From: James Card <jdcard at inreach.com>
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] turning off email, etc.
>Organization: JDC Data Services
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>6/12/01 6:51:44 AM, Rob Cunningham
<rob.cunn at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>>12/06/2001 13:09:40, James Card <jdcard at inreach.com>
wrote:
>>
>>>6/12/01 4:37:55 AM, Rob Cunningham
<rob.cunn at btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>What are you talking about "Opera mail client very useful
and, once
>>>patched, quite good altogether."? Patched?
>>>
>>>The author of that message offered (offers?) on their website
patched
>>>versions of omail32.dll, and instructions for how to modify
your
>>>opera.exe file, to correct some bugs in previous versions of
Opera.
>>>Later versions of Opera have fixed most of those problems.
>>
>>Author of what message? I've looked back and the only URL
I've seen is
>>yours.
>
>This message, which I quoted from in my first response and from
which
>you extracted the quote above:
> To: opera-users at opera.no
> From: <iixii at newmail.net>
> Subject: [Opera-users] Opera 5 Light
> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 16:01:35 +0100
>
>It should appear in the Opera-users archive at
>http://list.opera.com/pipermail/opera-users/.
>
>--
>James Card -- http://home.inreach.com/jdcard/
>The wise person restrains his words, and the one who keeps
>his cool is a discerning person. -- Proverbs 17:27
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 11
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 21:09:41 -0700
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>From: James Card <jdcard at inreach.com>
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] turning off email, etc.
>Organization: JDC Data Services
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>6/12/01 8:33:52 AM, "Tass" <anim at operamail.com> wrote:
>
>> ----SUBJECT ----> Re: [Opera-users] turning off email,
etc.
>>On 06/11/01 at 9:00 PM James Card wrote:
>>
>>>)How I wish it were possible to search the Opera-users
archive (at
>>>)http://web.opera.com/pipermail/opera-users/)! Here is one of
several
>>>)messages on this topic from my local e-mail files:
>>>)
>>>)To: opera-users at opera.no
>>>)From: <iixii at newmail.net>
>>>)Subject: [Opera-users] Opera 5 Light
>>>)Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 16:01:35 +0100
>>>)
>>>)I also deem the discussion about Opera's "overbloatedness"
extremely
>>>)useless. It's understandable that many people don't need the
[SNIP]
>>
>>The "discussion" is far from "useless". At least it is for me.
>
>Those were his words, not mine -- I agree that the discussion IS
valid.
>
>>Both (IE much more successful than NS) were designed to have
>>as great a presence throughout your computer experience as
>>possible. The more time you *see* IE while your doing work
or
>>play, the more you come to expect that it is just part of your
>>entire every-day, normal activities. NS did the same thing to try
>>to prevent IE from apparently becoming your computer.
>>
>>Once everyone started realizing that with just a couple more
lines
>>of code, a browser could easily be used as a shell for the OS.
>>THEN it could REALLY take over how your computer worked
and
>>looked. [SNIP]
>>
>>Opera seemed to be very proud to be a great program that did
>>what it did, did it very well. Not only took up little space, but
did
>>it without taking over your system's look, feel or resources.
>>
>>So my concern is more about the direction of Opera than with
>>any technical capabilities. With these additions, it *appears* as
>>though in the browser wars, Opera is wanting to join the Dark
Side
>>instead of being part of the Force that must end the Tyrant's rein.
>
>I know what you mean; any software that tries to take over my
system
>(another one on my list is RealNetworks with their battle against
>Windows Media Player) gets uninstalled quickly -- or at the
least, its
>roots yanked out of my Windows registry.
>
>However, I think that Opera has produced a good balance of
features
>while still providing tightly-written high-performance code.
>
>It appears that they want to move beyond the group of power-
users who
>take the time to evaluate and choose good tools for each of their
tasks,
>and then learn to use each of those individual tools to their fullest
>potential. The broader market is probably composed of folks
who don't
>want to put that much effort into the process, they just want it to
work
>-- and for them that is likely to mean that it should be very similar
to
>the browser they already know (IE or Netscape). They expect
that it will
>include e-mail, newsgroups, and instant messaging.
>
>The large companies that contract with Opera to develop
browser software
>for their specialized environments (such as the recently
announced deal
>with IBM) probably also expect that Opera provide these
functions that
>Microsoft and Netscape have taught people to expect as part of
the
>browser.
>
>I certainly don't see any indication that Opera is trying to take
over
>my entire system. It provides a great browser and basic e-mail,
instant
>messaging, and newsreader clients. It lets me configure each of
those
>features with much greater flexibility than IE or Netscape. AND,
even
>its options to become your default browser make sense and play
nice --
>which is a refreshing change from some of the others.
>
>The arguments about bloat are still valid, and I carry a copy of
Opera
>3.62 on a floppy in my briefcase for those occasions when I have
to use
>an older machine that doesn't have speedy processors and ample
drive
>space. But even though new versions of Opera won't fit on a
floppy, I
>still don't think of them as being bloated -- they're just so quick
and
>nimble compared to the competitors that "bloat" just doesn't seem
to
>fit.
>
>--
>James Card -- http://home.inreach.com/jdcard/
>The wise person restrains his words, and the one who keeps
>his cool is a discerning person. -- Proverbs 17:27
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 12
>From: "Dave Barton" <bmcs at ozemail.com.au>
>To: "Opera-Users at Opera. No" <opera-users at opera.no>
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:25:59 +1000
>Subject: [Opera-users] Rollover Images
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Does anyone here know if Opera (5.11) can handle roll-over
images?
>
>http://www-
4.ibm.com/software/webservers/hpbuilder/win/moreinfo_f1.html#
pe
>
>Mouse over dog image works fine in IE & NS, but does nothing
in Opera.
>
>Regards
>Dave Barton
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.256 / Virus Database: 129 - Release Date:
31.05.2001
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 13
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:45:37 -0600
>From: "Tass" <anim at operamail.com>
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>Subject: Re: [Opera-users] turning off email, etc.
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>
>
>{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ BEGIN ORIGINAL MESSAGE
}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
>
> ----SUBJECT ----> Re: [Opera-users] turning off email, etc.
>On 06/12/01 at 9:09 PM
>I was just minding my own business when
>James Card wrote:
>
>>)6/12/01 8:33:52 AM, "Tass" <anim at operamail.com> wrote:
>>)
>>)> ----SUBJECT ----> Re: [Opera-users] turning off email,
etc.
>>)>On 06/11/01 at 9:00 PM James Card wrote:
>>)>
>>)>>)How I wish it were possible to search the Opera-users
archive (at
>>)>>)http://web.opera.com/pipermail/opera-users/)! Here is one
of several
>>)>>)messages on this topic from my local e-mail files:
>>)>>)
>>)>>)To: opera-users at opera.no
>>)>>)From: <iixii at newmail.net>
>>)>>)Subject: [Opera-users] Opera 5 Light
>>)>>)Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 16:01:35 +0100
>>)>>)
>>)>>)I also deem the discussion about Opera's
"overbloatedness" extremely
>>)>>)useless. It's understandable that many people don't need the
[SNIP]
>>)>
>>)>The "discussion" is far from "useless". At least it is for me.
>>)
>>)Those were his words, not mine -- I agree that the discussion
IS valid.
>
>Granted. Didn't mean to sound as though I was pointing fingers at
you.
>In fact, it was not my intent to point a finger at anyone really. I
was
>just continuing the debate. :-)
>
>
>
>==========================
>>)>Both (IE much more successful than NS) were designed to
have
>>)>as great a presence throughout your computer experience as
>>)>possible. The more time you *see* IE while your doing work
or
>>)>play, the more you come to expect that it is just part of your
>>)>entire every-day, normal activities. NS did the same thing to
try
>>)>to prevent IE from apparently becoming your computer.
>>)>
>>)>Once everyone started realizing that with just a couple more
lines
>>)>of code, a browser could easily be used as a shell for the OS.
>>)>THEN it could REALLY take over how your computer
worked and
>>)>looked. [SNIP]
>>)>
>>)>Opera seemed to be very proud to be a great program that did
>>)>what it did, did it very well. Not only took up little space,
but did
>>)>it without taking over your system's look, feel or resources.
>>)>
>>)>So my concern is more about the direction of Opera than with
>>)>any technical capabilities. With these additions, it *appears*
as
>>)>though in the browser wars, Opera is wanting to join the Dark
Side
>>)>instead of being part of the Force that must end the Tyrant's
rein.
>>)
>>)I know what you mean; any software that tries to take over my
system
>>)(another one on my list is RealNetworks with their battle
against
>>)Windows Media Player) gets uninstalled quickly -- or at the
least, its
>>)roots yanked out of my Windows registry.
>>)
>>)However, I think that Opera has produced a good balance of
features
>>)while still providing tightly-written high-performance code.
>>)
>>)It appears that they want to move beyond the group of power-
users who
>>)take the time to evaluate and choose good tools for each of
their tasks,
>>)and then learn to use each of those individual tools to their
fullest
>>)potential. The broader market is probably composed of folks
who don't
>>)want to put that much effort into the process, they just want it to
work
>>)-- and for them that is likely to mean that it should be very
similar to
>>)the browser they already know (IE or Netscape). They expect
that it will
>>)include e-mail, newsgroups, and instant messaging.
>>)
>>)The large companies that contract with Opera to develop
browser software
>>)for their specialized environments (such as the recently
announced deal
>>)with IBM) probably also expect that Opera provide these
functions that
>>)Microsoft and Netscape have taught people to expect as part of
the
>>)browser.
>>)
>>)I certainly don't see any indication that Opera is trying to take
over
>>)my entire system. It provides a great browser and basic e-mail,
instant
>>)messaging, and newsreader clients. It lets me configure each of
those
>>)features with much greater flexibility than IE or Netscape.
AND, even
>>)its options to become your default browser make sense and
play nice --
>>)which is a refreshing change from some of the others.
>>)
>>)The arguments about bloat are still valid, and I carry a copy of
Opera
>>)3.62 on a floppy in my briefcase for those occasions when I
have to use
>>)an older machine that doesn't have speedy processors and
ample drive
>>)space. But even though new versions of Opera won't fit on a
floppy, I
>>)still don't think of them as being bloated -- they're just so quick
and
>>)nimble compared to the competitors that "bloat" just doesn't
seem to
>>)fit.
>>)
>>)--
>>)James Card
>=====-----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====-
---=====-----=====
>-------=====------===== END ORIGINAL MESSAGE=====---
---======-------
>
>Hi again James.
>
>I can't say I'd disagree with much of anything you've said here.
>
>Agreed that these items aren't the end of the world. Nor are they
>reason to start heading down the road.
>I'm not offended necessarily about them being there, or how the
>latest version of Opera works for me.
>I'm not even really saying that they shouldn't have done it.
>I can fully appreciate that others may have come to expect these
>kinds of programs to have been combined into one package from
>previous conditioning, and would think a browser without them
lacking.
>
>All I am saying is,
>"I" don't like it. :-)
>
>I also don't think it's a rational thing to do to mix in raspberries
or
>cinnamon with otherwise wonderfully perfect chocolate. But
strangely
>enough, a lot of other people do.
>But as long as the rest of the meal is everything I'd expected of it,
>I'm not going to walk out of the restaurant just because they have
>a Sacher Torte on the menu.
>I'll just have the delicious meal and order a different dessert;
>no matter how much I was hoping for some chocolate.
>
>T
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 14
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:48:01 -0400
>To: opera-users at opera.com
>From: Warrick Bell <wjbell at mail2.gis.net>
>Subject: [Opera-users] 2 pages, no images/links--JavaScript the
culprit?
>Reply-To: opera-users at opera.com
>
>Dear Operators,
>
>I offer for your perusal and comment two pages which I'm having
trouble
>with. There are only illustrative examples--there are many
others similar
>on these two sites.
>The first is from eBay:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-
cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1437913994
>The large box near the bottom of the page is supposed to show
the item up
>for auction (and it does show it if I view the page in IE). The
box to the
>right which shows a file folder icon (on my Win98 machines) is
supposed to
>be three boxes which contain icons for three different views of
the item in
>the large box. It's only a recent thing that images hosted by eBay
have
>stopped appearing. I don't do JavaScript but it seems that's
what's
>generating the image source URL.
>
>On a similar note is this page:
> http://www.silive.com/homes/
>The central column on the page is supposed to be full of links,
and they
>work as links in IE. Again, looking at the source I see a bunch of
>JS. Most other pages on the silive.com site seem to behave in a
similar way.
>
>I'm running O5.11 on a Win98 machine. JavaScript is enabled.
Is my setup
>at fault or is there something else going on?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Warrick Bell
>wjbell at mail2.gis.net
>Warrick Bell
><wjbell at mail2.gis.net>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>--
>Opera-users mailing list
>Opera-users at opera.com
>http://list.opera.com/mailman/listinfo/opera-users
>
>
>End of Opera-users Digest
>
>
More information about the Opera-users
mailing list