[Opera-Linux] What's with all the "pipe" FDs in Opera?
Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen
eirik at opera.com
Fri Jun 26 09:05:28 UTC 2009
Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen <eirik at opera.com> writes:
> Kenneth Crudup <kenny at panix.com> writes:
>
>> Every now and then, Opera gets into a state where it won't load pages.
>> When this happens (pages across multiple tabs gets stuck in "Sending
>> request to <site>" or "Compeleted request to <site>") I do an "lsof"
>> and either see a large number of FDs of cache pages, or lately, a huge
>> number of pipes:
>>
>> ----
>> opera 22871 kenny 1w FIFO 0,6 2483416 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 2w FIFO 0,6 2483416 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 5r FIFO 0,6 4795120 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 6w FIFO 0,6 4795120 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 67w FIFO 0,6 4798071 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 73r FIFO 0,6 4795129 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 74w FIFO 0,6 4795129 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 75r FIFO 0,6 4795133 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 135r FIFO 0,6 4798072 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 182w FIFO 0,6 4798073 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 891r FIFO 0,6 5737187 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1024r FIFO 0,6 5731322 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1025w FIFO 0,6 5731322 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1026r FIFO 0,6 5731458 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1027w FIFO 0,6 5731458 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1028r FIFO 0,6 5731326 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1029w FIFO 0,6 5731326 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1030r FIFO 0,6 5731413 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1031w FIFO 0,6 5731413 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1032r FIFO 0,6 5731330 pipe
>> opera 22871 kenny 1033w FIFO 0,6 5731330 pipe
>> <about 118 more of these>
>> ----
>>
>> In any case, I think I can't browse 'cause I'm out of FDs again (currently
>> up to 1350 FDs) So, if plugins are turned off, what's Opera pipe()ing to?
>
> Ouch.
>
> Even with plug-ins active (which your next post may indicate they are
> after all...) it's hard to see any reason to create so many of them.
>
> Maybe if we are spawning new pluginwrappers and fail to kill off the old
> pipes. That would create two new pipes every time, I guess.
>
> Open files is even harder to understand. Even if we fail to set
> CLOEXEC, the file descriptor in the origin process should be closed and
> gone when we close the file. So that sounds like we're not closing the
> files properly. Which is really strange.
Then again, when I look at my own opera (ls -la /proc/<pid>/fd), which
has only been running for about 2 weeks and have never had plug-ins
enabled, there's 194 open file descriptors, 124 of them pointing into
cache and 50 into vps. And I've even got the mail database open (6 file
descriptors in total), even though I've never activated mail in this
opera.
None of that seems good to me.
eirik
More information about the Opera-Linux
mailing list